<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can using a T.V. to babysit my kids be bad for them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/</link>
	<description>a view from mid-America</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:16:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Buck</title>
		<link>http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1020</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mid-riffs.com/?p=1236#comment-1020</guid>
		<description>We have to think of substitution, though. Would the baby watching &quot;Baby Einstein&quot; otherwise have been reading a book with its parents?  Or would it just be stuck in a crib while someone fixes dinner or takes a shower?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have to think of substitution, though. Would the baby watching &#8220;Baby Einstein&#8221; otherwise have been reading a book with its parents?  Or would it just be stuck in a crib while someone fixes dinner or takes a shower?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMcGee</title>
		<link>http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1016</link>
		<dc:creator>JMcGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mid-riffs.com/?p=1236#comment-1016</guid>
		<description>The suit you speak of would be the very definition of frivolous and un-winable. Since when has a company with Disney&#039;s resources been afraid of such a thing? I think both you and the NYT reporter overestimate how scared Disney is of a law suit. Disney is more afraid of a consumer backlash (ill will).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The suit you speak of would be the very definition of frivolous and un-winable. Since when has a company with Disney&#8217;s resources been afraid of such a thing? I think both you and the NYT reporter overestimate how scared Disney is of a law suit. Disney is more afraid of a consumer backlash (ill will).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BKisida</title>
		<link>http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>BKisida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mid-riffs.com/?p=1236#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>Good will? 

This was absolutely based on a lawsuit threat and the refunds are being labeled a &quot;settlement.&quot;

From the NYT:

&quot;Last year, lawyers threatened a class-action lawsuit for unfair and deceptive practices unless Disney agreed to refund the full purchase price to all who bought the videos since 2004. “The Walt Disney Company’s entire Baby Einstein marketing regime is based on express and implied claims that their videos are educational and beneficial for early childhood development,” a letter from the lawyers said, calling those claims “false because research shows that television viewing is potentially harmful for very young children.”

The letter cited estimates from The Washington Post and Business Week that Baby Einstein controlled 90 percent of the baby media market, and sold $200 million worth of products annually.

The letter also described studies showing that television exposure at ages 1 through 3 is associated with attention problems at age 7.

In response, the Baby Einstein company will refund $15.99 for up to four “Baby Einstein” DVDs per household, bought between June 5, 2004, and Sept. 5, 2009, and returned to the company.

Lawyers in the matter refused to comment on the settlement.

Last month, Baby Einstein announced the new refunds — or “enhanced consumer satisfaction guarantee” — but made no mention of the lawyers’ demands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good will? </p>
<p>This was absolutely based on a lawsuit threat and the refunds are being labeled a &#8220;settlement.&#8221;</p>
<p>From the NYT:</p>
<p>&#8220;Last year, lawyers threatened a class-action lawsuit for unfair and deceptive practices unless Disney agreed to refund the full purchase price to all who bought the videos since 2004. “The Walt Disney Company’s entire Baby Einstein marketing regime is based on express and implied claims that their videos are educational and beneficial for early childhood development,” a letter from the lawyers said, calling those claims “false because research shows that television viewing is potentially harmful for very young children.”</p>
<p>The letter cited estimates from The Washington Post and Business Week that Baby Einstein controlled 90 percent of the baby media market, and sold $200 million worth of products annually.</p>
<p>The letter also described studies showing that television exposure at ages 1 through 3 is associated with attention problems at age 7.</p>
<p>In response, the Baby Einstein company will refund $15.99 for up to four “Baby Einstein” DVDs per household, bought between June 5, 2004, and Sept. 5, 2009, and returned to the company.</p>
<p>Lawyers in the matter refused to comment on the settlement.</p>
<p>Last month, Baby Einstein announced the new refunds — or “enhanced consumer satisfaction guarantee” — but made no mention of the lawyers’ demands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Rank Stranger</title>
		<link>http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>The Rank Stranger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mid-riffs.com/?p=1236#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>Two points...I think that BKisida is harnessing the true American enterprising spirit of the day and;

Harry Harlow.  He did some studies with rhesus monkeys between 1957 and 1963 measuring maternal separation.  He fashioned two &quot;surrogate&quot; mothers for the baby rhesus (rhesi?) - one covered in terrycloth and one made of wire with an added bottle of milk for food.  He wanted to see if the baby monkeys were more likely to attach to the terrycloth surrogate, which felt more like their true mother...or to the wire surrogate, which provided food like their real mother.  Turns out the babies would snuggle with the terrycloth surrogate until they got hungry and then they would stretch out to the wire surrogate and drink the milk.

The moral?  Well, first, I bet these baby rhesus monkeys grew to be pretty effed up (assuming they were not slaughtered after the experiment - remember, it was the 50&#039;s &amp; 60&#039;s), and second...you cannot replace mom and dad with surrogates.  Even when it is a televised broadcast of musical genius.

now...where is my ebay account login...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two points&#8230;I think that BKisida is harnessing the true American enterprising spirit of the day and;</p>
<p>Harry Harlow.  He did some studies with rhesus monkeys between 1957 and 1963 measuring maternal separation.  He fashioned two &#8220;surrogate&#8221; mothers for the baby rhesus (rhesi?) &#8211; one covered in terrycloth and one made of wire with an added bottle of milk for food.  He wanted to see if the baby monkeys were more likely to attach to the terrycloth surrogate, which felt more like their true mother&#8230;or to the wire surrogate, which provided food like their real mother.  Turns out the babies would snuggle with the terrycloth surrogate until they got hungry and then they would stretch out to the wire surrogate and drink the milk.</p>
<p>The moral?  Well, first, I bet these baby rhesus monkeys grew to be pretty effed up (assuming they were not slaughtered after the experiment &#8211; remember, it was the 50&#8242;s &amp; 60&#8242;s), and second&#8230;you cannot replace mom and dad with surrogates.  Even when it is a televised broadcast of musical genius.</p>
<p>now&#8230;where is my ebay account login&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMcGee</title>
		<link>http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>JMcGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mid-riffs.com/?p=1236#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone sued. A consumer group filed a complaint with the FTC which resulted in no enforcement action. From what I can tell Disney is simply refunding money to buy good will.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ftc.gov/os/closings/staff/071205einst.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here is the FTC closing letter.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone sued. A consumer group filed a complaint with the FTC which resulted in no enforcement action. From what I can tell Disney is simply refunding money to buy good will.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ftc.gov/os/closings/staff/071205einst.pdf" rel="nofollow">Here is the FTC closing letter.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay P. Greene</title>
		<link>http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1012</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay P. Greene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mid-riffs.com/?p=1236#comment-1012</guid>
		<description>It seems entirely unreasonable to me that someone could sue because some videos have not been proven to make kids smarter.  Axe deoderant doesn&#039;t make young women throw themselves at guys either.  Do all of the disappointed adolescent boys have a claim?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems entirely unreasonable to me that someone could sue because some videos have not been proven to make kids smarter.  Axe deoderant doesn&#8217;t make young women throw themselves at guys either.  Do all of the disappointed adolescent boys have a claim?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Buck</title>
		<link>http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1008</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Buck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mid-riffs.com/?p=1236#comment-1008</guid>
		<description>Arbitrage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arbitrage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BKisida</title>
		<link>http://mid-riffs.com/2009/10/can-using-a-t-v-to-babysit-my-kids-be-bad-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>BKisida</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mid-riffs.com/?p=1236#comment-998</guid>
		<description>Well, I don&#039;t know. Nothing I read in that article convinced me there was any actual evidence that they didn&#039;t work. And, while I haven&#039;t read any of the studies that claim that tv is bad for toddlers, I imagine it is like most research and is generalizing from an average effect. That doesn&#039;t mean that some kids don&#039;t benefit.

On another note, did you read the terms of the refund? They&#039;re refunding four per household, at $15.99 a piece.  I can get a pack of 26 of them on ebay right now for less than fifty dollars.  How is it that the prices on ebay haven&#039;t spiked yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I don&#8217;t know. Nothing I read in that article convinced me there was any actual evidence that they didn&#8217;t work. And, while I haven&#8217;t read any of the studies that claim that tv is bad for toddlers, I imagine it is like most research and is generalizing from an average effect. That doesn&#8217;t mean that some kids don&#8217;t benefit.</p>
<p>On another note, did you read the terms of the refund? They&#8217;re refunding four per household, at $15.99 a piece.  I can get a pack of 26 of them on ebay right now for less than fifty dollars.  How is it that the prices on ebay haven&#8217;t spiked yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

