Who’s Really Segregating?
Posted by GRitter | Arkansas, Education, Politics | February 07, 2011
Last month, just around the time we were celebrating the legacy of Martin Luther King — traditional public school districts in Wake County, North Carolina and in Akron, Ohio took actions to limit the choices of students and, essentially, IMPOSE racially segregated schools on the students. As Brian described earlier on on this site, an Ohio mom is in jail for registering her children at the grandfather’s address (a few miles down the road) to get them into a safer and presumably better school system. Here is CNN’s version of the story.
Down south in North Carolina, earlier in January, the school board successfully overturned the district’s longstanding intentional school integration policy (a policy viewed as successful by most accounts). According to the Washington Post, the policy is one of economic integration and is based on a goal that no school should have more than 40% of its students qualify for free and reduced school lunches. ”The district tried to strike this balance through student assignments and choice, establishing magnet programs in poor areas to draw middle-class kids. Although most students here ride buses to school, officials said fewer than 10 percent are bused to a school to maintain diversity, and most bus rides are less than five miles.”
However, if reading the paper seems like a lot of work … let’s instead learn about this policy shift from the ever-conservative news icon, Stephen Colbert:
| The Colbert Report | Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| The Word – Disintegration | ||||
|
||||
Many education observers do not like the idea of segregating students by race, particularly when such segregation is imposed on the most marginal students. We certainly don’t. Some of the crowd who actively oppose racial segregation in schools are — inexplicably — spending their time talking about the levels of racial segregation in charter schools. We think this is silly for lots of reasons. Mostly, it’s because more than 95% of America’s public school students attend traditional public schools while a relative handful attend public charters. Also, segregation is NEVER IMPOSED on students in public charter schools as it can be in traditional public schools. Yet, many who claim to speak for students and for their civil rights are unfortunately attacking public charter schools, which serve fewer than 5% of students nationwide and serve 0% of them against their will.
Perhaps these defenders of the status quo … excuse me, I mean defenders of students … should stop looking for ways to undermine charter schools (such as KIPP) and instead focus their criticism on the traditional public school leaders, such as those in Akron and Wake County, who are doing their best every day to separate their white wealthy students from their disadvantaged peers by promoting explicit segregation-friendly policies.
It’s session time down in Little Rock, which, among other things, signals the arrival of a certain amount of legislative silliness.
The
A disturbing
There was some bizarre news out of Little Rock on Monday. First, LRSD attorney Chris Heller spoke on behalf of the LRSD and voiced support for a new charter school proposed to help former high school dropouts. Apparently, LRSD’s opposition to charter schools isn’t absolute. The state Board tabled the decision for a month.
The Arkansas Department of Education released its adequate yearly progress (AYP) report for schools today. You can find the press release
You never know what you’re going to get when Arkansas makes a splash in the national media. It could be a 